--- title: "BioTransition: Dynamic Network Biomarker Analysis for Critical Transition Detection" author: - name: Zaoqu Liu affiliation: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College email: liuzaoqu@163.com date: "`r Sys.Date()`" output: BiocStyle::html_document: toc: true toc_depth: 3 toc_float: true vignette: > %\VignetteIndexEntry{BioTransition: Dynamic Network Biomarker Analysis} %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown} %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8} --- ```{r setup, include=FALSE} knitr::opts_chunk$set( collapse = TRUE, comment = "#>", fig.width = 7, fig.height = 5, warning = FALSE, message = FALSE ) ``` # Introduction **BioTransition** is a comprehensive R/Bioconductor package for detecting critical transitions in biological systems using Dynamic Network Biomarker (DNB) theory. Critical transitions—abrupt shifts between alternative stable states—are ubiquitous in complex biological processes, including: - Disease onset and progression - Cellular differentiation - Developmental transitions - Treatment response Identifying the pre-transition state (tipping point) before an irreversible shift occurs is crucial for early warning and therapeutic intervention. ## Theoretical Background The DNB theory, proposed by Chen et al. (2012), provides a model-free approach to detect early warning signals of critical transitions. The core principle is that a dominant group of molecules (DNB module) exhibits three key characteristics near the tipping point: 1. **Increased variation**: Standard deviation (SD) of DNB members increases dramatically 2. **Enhanced correlation**: Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) among DNB members strengthens 3. **Decreased correlation**: PCC between DNB members and non-DNB molecules weakens The composite index (CI) quantifies the transition signal: $$CI = \frac{\overline{SD_{in}} \cdot \overline{|PCC_{in}|}}{\overline{|PCC_{out}|}}$$ # Installation ## From Bioconductor ```{r install-bioc, eval=FALSE} if (!require("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) install.packages("BiocManager") BiocManager::install("BioTransition") ``` ## From GitHub ```{r install-github, eval=FALSE} devtools::install_github("SolvingLab/BioTransition") ``` # Quick Start ```{r load-package} library(BioTransition) ``` ## Prepare Example Data For demonstration, we'll create a simulated expression matrix with three biological states: Normal, Pre-disease, and Disease. ```{r example-data} set.seed(42) # Simulate expression data n_genes <- 500 n_samples <- 30 # Create expression matrix expr <- matrix( rnorm(n_genes * n_samples, mean = 10, sd = 2), nrow = n_genes, ncol = n_samples ) rownames(expr) <- paste0("Gene", 1:n_genes) colnames(expr) <- paste0("Sample", 1:n_samples) # Define sample states sample_info <- data.frame( sample_id = colnames(expr), state = rep(c("Normal", "PreDisease", "Disease"), each = 10) ) head(sample_info) ``` ## Run cDNB Analysis The conventional DNB (cDNB) method is the fastest approach for initial screening: ```{r cdnb-analysis, eval=FALSE} result_cdnb <- cDNB( expr = expr, state = sample_info, state.levels = c("Normal", "PreDisease", "Disease"), cor.method = "pearson", variation.method = "sd" ) # View DNB scores across states result_cdnb$DNB.score ``` ## Run tDNB Analysis The topological DNB (tDNB) method, developed in this package, leverages network topology and scale-free properties for more robust detection: ```{r tdnb-analysis, eval=FALSE} result_tdnb <- tDNB( expr = expr, state = sample_info, state.levels = c("Normal", "PreDisease", "Disease"), cor.method = "pearson", variation.method = "sd", min.size = 10, max.size = 200 ) # View results result_tdnb$DNB.score result_tdnb$DNB.genes ``` # Available Methods BioTransition implements seven complementary DNB methodologies: | Method | Description | PPI Required | Reference | |:-------|:------------|:------------:|:----------| | `cDNB` | Conventional DNB | No | Chen et al., 2012 | | `tDNB` | Topological DNB | No | Liu Z. (this package) | | `LcDNB` | Local DNB | Yes | — | | `LDNB` | Landscape DNB | Yes | Liu et al., 2019 | | `MDNB` | Module-based DNB | Yes | Li et al., 2022 | | `TSNMB` | Time-series network module | Yes | Zhong et al., 2022 | | `TSLE` | Time-series leading edge | Yes | Liu et al., 2020 | ## Methods Requiring PPI Networks For methods that require protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, BioTransition provides built-in networks from STRING database: ```{r ppi-data} # Human PPI network data(ppi_h) head(ppi_h) # Mouse PPI network data(ppi_m) head(ppi_m) ``` ## Example: LcDNB with PPI Network ```{r lcdnb-example, eval=FALSE} result_lcdnb <- LcDNB( expr = expr, state = sample_info, state.levels = c("Normal", "PreDisease", "Disease"), ppi = ppi_h, # Use human PPI network cor.method = "pearson" ) ``` # Interpreting Results All DNB methods return a list containing: - `DNB.score`: Composite index (CI) values across all states - `DNB.genes`: Genes identified in the DNB module - Additional method-specific outputs ## Identifying the Critical State The state with the highest CI value is identified as the critical (pre-transition) state: ```{r interpret, eval=FALSE} # Find critical state critical_state <- result_cdnb$DNB.score$State[ which.max(result_cdnb$DNB.score$CI) ] print(paste("Critical state:", critical_state)) # Number of DNB genes print(paste("Number of DNB genes:", length(result_cdnb$DNB.genes))) ``` # Performance Optimization BioTransition uses C++ implementations via Rcpp for computationally intensive operations: - Correlation matrix calculation - P-value computation - Module scoring This provides 2-20x speedup compared to pure R implementations. # Session Information ```{r session-info} sessionInfo() ``` # References 1. Chen L, Liu R, Liu ZP, Li M, Aihara K. (2012). Detecting early-warning signals for sudden deterioration of complex diseases by dynamical network biomarkers. *Scientific Reports*, 2:342. doi: [10.1038/srep00342](https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00342) 2. Liu R, Chen P, Chen L. (2019). Single-sample landscape entropy reveals the imminent phase transition during disease progression. *National Science Review*, 7(7):1175-1185. doi: [10.1093/nsr/nwy162](https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwy162) 3. Li M, Zeng T, Liu R, Chen L. (2022). Detecting tissue-specific early warning signals for complex diseases based on dynamical network biomarkers. *The Innovation*, 3(5):100364. doi: [10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100364](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100364) 4. Zhong J, Han C, Wang Y, Chen P, Liu R. (2022). Identifying the critical state of complex diseases by the novel concept of sample-specific network module biomarker. *Journal of Molecular Cell Biology*, 14(6):mjac052. doi: [10.1093/jmcb/mjac052](https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjac052) 5. Liu X, Chang X, Liu R, Yu X, Chen L, Aihara K. (2020). Quantifying critical states of complex diseases using single-sample dynamic network biomarkers. *Bioinformatics*, 36(4):1068-1074. doi: [10.1093/bioinformatics/btz758](https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz758)